# Version control: is Git any useful for solutions built on FileMaker?

**URL:** <https://the.fmsoup.org/t/version-control-is-git-any-useful-for-solutions-built-on-filemaker/3466>\
**Category:** Lounge (Discussions)\
**Created:** [March 22, 2023, 12:20am UTC](https://the.fmsoup.org/t/version-control-is-git-any-useful-for-solutions-built-on-filemaker/3466 "2023-03-22T00:20:49Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jwilling](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex030/user_avatar/the.fmsoup.org/jwilling/32/256_2.png) [@jwilling](https://the.fmsoup.org/u/jwilling)\
**Post date:** [March 11, 2024, 11:20pm UTC](https://the.fmsoup.org/t/version-control-is-git-any-useful-for-solutions-built-on-filemaker/3466/22 "2024-03-11T23:20:49Z")

</div>

Merging would be a game changer! That's my #1 hurdle preventing us from any sort of feature/bugfix branching currently on the vertical solution I maintain.

And yeah, that's really on Claris to provide some kind of trustworthy "patch" system.

It would be tricky, but I do believe that community developers like yourself would be able to provide the complementary tools: adequate branch diffing and comparison, and automation/UI around the patch process. i.e. Claris doesn't need to do _everything_ to make this a reality.

[Previous page](https://the.fmsoup.org/t/version-control-is-git-any-useful-for-solutions-built-on-filemaker/3466.md?page=1)
