# What solution did you find for your runtimes?

**URL:** <https://the.fmsoup.org/t/what-solution-did-you-find-for-your-runtimes/2001>\
**Category:** Lounge (Discussions)\
**Tags:** filemaker, xojo\
**Created:** [April 7, 2021, 1:05pm UTC](https://the.fmsoup.org/t/what-solution-did-you-find-for-your-runtimes/2001 "2021-04-07T13:05:11Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![harvest](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex030/user_avatar/the.fmsoup.org/harvest/32/231_2.png) [@harvest](https://the.fmsoup.org/u/harvest)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2021, 4:12pm UTC](https://the.fmsoup.org/t/what-solution-did-you-find-for-your-runtimes/2001/2 "2021-04-07T16:12:47Z")

</div>

Hi and welcome to the soup!

I think you can have a lengthy read about runtime issues here

> [@Goodbye FileMaker](https://the.fmsoup.org/t/goodbye-filemaker/1036):
>
> Hi all, For some time I have struggled to make sense of the pricing strategy FileMaker have pursued - it is "really" difficult to sell in my area of expertise. Having a 5 user minimum licence for a server based solution and making that a yearly cost before I have even built in my development costs and maintenance fees just make it non viable. The removal of the runtime is an absolute disaster for FileMaker in my opinion - why not have the option but charge a fee every time you deploy a runtim…

The thread is from last year but still holds a lot of valid arguments. At least it's a good starting point.

---

_[View the full topic](https://the.fmsoup.org/t/what-solution-did-you-find-for-your-runtimes/2001)._
